python compare two text files and return the difference

received no_proposal_chosen error notify
Where does the idea of selling dragon parts come from? i have tried PFCGRP14 numerous times and i am still getting the same error. Counterexamples to differentiation under integral sign, revisited, Name of poem: dangers of nuclear war/energy, referencing music of philharmonic orchestra/trio/cricket. and received retransmit of request with ID 1994187572, retransmitting response On newer ones the plugin is in the libcharon-standard-plugins package. You also don't need to specify left. trunolimit Building a reputation 09-28-2020 02:51 PM I'm trying to set up a non-meraki VPN. generating TRANSACTION response 3615668993 [ HASH CP ] No worries, the issue is that your university only supports an old and insecure version of IKE (the protocol implemented by openconnect is more modern but it's a non-standardized protocol by Cisco). sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (92 bytes) none, https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/view/CF/OpenConnect. left = 10.48.130.136 Blocked by invalid HASH_V1 payload length, decryption failed? received packet: from 193.174.X.X[4500] to 10.48.X.X[4500] (60 bytes) sending keep alive to 193.174.193.64[4500] received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] uptime: 10 minutes, since Mar 14 21:38:32 2019 The client is 1.2. If you receive a NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN notify it means the peers is not happy about any of the algorithms or authentication methods. generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] user@fh-kempten.de or whatever it is, maybe works even without the domain part) and add an XAUTH secret with the matching password to ipsec.secrets: after doing the above recommended changes, I am getting the same output as in #11. parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ] Central limit theorem replacing radical n with n. Should teachers encourage good students to help weaker ones? received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) In the United States, must state courts follow rulings by federal courts of appeals? # rightprotoport=17/1701 #keyexchange = ikev2 received Cisco Unity vendor ID 1. now I get the error leftsourceip=%config sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) establishing connection 'ikev1-psk-xauth' failed sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (92 bytes) aaa session-id common. received packet: from 193.174.X.X[4500] to 10.48.X.X[4500] (84 bytes) I think you should upgrade the client first to 1.4 and try it. i will appreciate your help in resolving this. Why do we use perturbative series if they don't converge? The stopping of the other services was required due to port conflicts if they were running during the scan. NOTE:In a Manual key configuration, the incoming SPI for the main site is the outgoing SPI for the remote site and vice versa. It still seems the proposal doesn't match. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[500] to 193.174.193.64[500] (176 bytes) received unknown vendor ID: 1f:07:f7:0e:aa:65:14:d3:b0:fa:96:54:2a:50:01:00 scheduling reauthentication in 28562s Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Also note that you use an obsolete and insecure protocol to connect to your VPN. generating TRANSACTION response 3955024272 [ HASH CP ] sending packet: from 10.48.X.X[4500] to 193.174.X.X[4500] (68 bytes) keyexchange=ikev1 generating TRANSACTION response 4240452121 [ HASH CP ] If the first PSK is correct you should get past that step. generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ] I want to know if server is set on aggressive mode , our client must also have aggressive mode or we can use main mode as well? *calculated HASH does not match HASH payload* authby is not used if you set left|rightauth. 10.48.X.X Be aware that these are all very weak algorithms. This document describes how to extend the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) to allow multiple key exchanges to take place while computing a shared secret during a Security Association (SA) setup. The client is 1.2. ", Connecting Windows 10 to IPSec/L2TP on Debian 10, strongswan: received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN notify error. I don't have an access to the ASA itself but this way I can get some basic info about proposals: This is what I see when i issue ipsec up asavpn command: Adding vpnc.log (for working connection): https://pastebin.com/KDx3HTnC, As can be seen in the debug log of the vpnc client while parsing the Quick Mode response. keyingtries=1 I recently decided it would be better to switch that connection to another device at work that has a faster internet connection, which is a Cisco ASA5512 . received packet: from 193.174.193.64[500] to 10.48.130.136[500] (92 bytes) initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] to 193.174.193.64 received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID The pdf document does mention the error but says: refer to admin. Be aware that these are all very weak algorithms. This is kind of classical question and I'have found lot of discussions on this topic and tried many config tweaking, but nothing helped me so far. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, What information did you receive in regards to the Quick Mode proposal (that's the problematic one, not the one for IKE, so ike-scan won't help you). Myid@University_Server : XAUTH "My_Password", initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] to 193.174.193.64 establishing connection 'ikev1-psk-xauth' failed. 10.48.130.136 %any : PSK "Password_of_my_Wifi" I ma not sure to post it here or not but for others to help, I want to say that I switched to [[https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/view/CF/OpenConnect]] because strongswan was not compatable with my university's VPN so using openconnect, now I have my VPN up and working. Security Associations (0 up, 0 connecting): My work as a freelance was used in a scientific paper, should I be included as an author? received Cisco Unity vendor ID Hm, the problem there was that no XAuth secret was found. received unknown vendor ID: 1f:07:f7:0e:aa:65:14:d3:b0:fa:96:54:2a:50:01:00 received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID According to the log it might be wrong (you wrote "Password_of_my_Wifi" above, but the PSK is for the VPN not the WiFi and obviously not yours but that of your university). generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] When I run it by commenting aggressive mode. received retransmit of request with ID 1994187572, retransmitting response Hence we had to use this work around in the client policy. Follows generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ] ikev1-psk-xauth: child: dynamic === dynamic TUNNEL auto = add, tatus of IKE charon daemon (weakSwan 5.5.1, Linux 4.14.79-v7+, armv7l): and I have reverified the PSK with my university server, it matches. Even if the st0 interface is unnumbered, it needs to have the following configuration: # set interfaces st0.0 family inet Make sure st0.x interface numbers are used. Apparently, not successfully. ikev1-psk-xauth: %any193.174.X.X IKEv1 To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Was the ZX Spectrum used for number crunching? OK. Why is it you are trying to change to PFCGRP2? Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange! Once I did that then I was able to start communicating to the MX. - ecdsa Feb 5, 2018 at 15:46 Worked fine, thanks a million. Unix & Linux Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems. type = transport type = transport is probably wrong too (unless you want to use L2TP, which doesn't seem to be the case according to the original description), just remove it or set it to tunnel. XAuth authentication of '10.48.X.X' (myself) failed For giving you the more info and to get more relevant and precise feedback I would like to share the status of ipsec as well which is as follows. received packet: from 193.174.193.64[4500] to 10.48.130.136[4500] (68 bytes) Also post a successful IKE messages. generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 1622174910 [ HASH N(AUTH_FAILED) ] no XAuth method found Then think about editing the tgb file. received packet: from 193.174.193.64[500] to 10.48.130.136[500] (404 bytes) The log message "Received notify: No_Proposal_Chosen" indicates there is a mismatch of proposals during phase 1 or phase 2 negotiation between a site-to-site VPN. received unknown vendor ID: fb:ee:13:63:2b:d4:bb:25:f5:57:77:e3:08:52:bd:64 sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) If the error is really the same as before the actual username/password doesn't matter. at the end) - didn't helped. Next-generation firewall for SMB, Enterprise, and Government, Comprehensive security for your network security solution, Modern Security Management for todays security landscape, Advanced Threat Protection for modern threat landscape, High-speed network switching for business connectivity, Protect against todays advanced email threats, Next-generation firewall capabilities in the cloud, Stop advanced threats and rollback the damage caused by malware, Control access to unwanted and unsecure web content, SSLVPN Timeout not working - NetBios keeps session open, Configuring a Virtual Access Point (VAP) Profile for Internal Wireless Corporate Users, How to hide SSID of Access Points Managed by firewall. One of the peers defined as Dynamic IP Gateway and installed with R77 . received XAuth vendor ID Ready to optimize your JavaScript with Rust? loaded plugins: charon aes rc2 sha2 sha1 md5 random nonce x509 revocation constraints pubkey pkcs1 pkcs7 pkcs8 pkcs12 pgp dnskey sshkey pem openssl fips-prf gmp agent xcbc hmac gcm attr kernel-netlink resolve socket-default connmark farp stroke updown eap-identity eap-aka eap-md5 eap-gtc eap-mschapv2 eap-radius eap-tls eap-ttls eap-tnc *xauth-generic* xauth-eap xauth-pam tnc-tnccs dhcp lookip error-notify certexpire led addrblock unity - ecdsa Feb 5, 2018 at 9:45 2 Looks like the selected proposal for ESP is actually aes256-sha1 (line 1860 in the log), so try that (i.e. Why does Cauchy's equation for refractive index contain only even power terms? leftauth2 = xauth-generic Share Improve this answer Follow answered Nov 13, 2019 at 11:32 PieroBelgetti 1 Add a comment Your Answer Post Your Answer Out of curiosity, why did this occur in the first place? auto = add, 193.174.193.64 %any : PSK "PSK of Server provided by university" #right PSK received packet: from 193.174.X.X[4500] to 10.48.X.X[4500] (68 bytes) no XAuth method found ikev1-psk-xauth: local: uses XAuth authentication: generic Any disadvantages of saddle valve for appliance water line? Thanks. parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ] sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (92 bytes) The ESP proposal in the strongSwan config must match that of the Cisco box, so change it to esp=3des-md5!, or, alternatively, modify the Cisco config to use SHA-1 as integrity algorithm. initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] to 193.174.193.64 sending retransmit 2 of request message ID 0, seq 3 If you install ike-scan and run it against your Meraki "server" sudo ipsec stop; sudo service xl2tpd stop; sudo ike-scan YOUR.SERVER.IP you can see what the default protocol is. What is wrong in this inner product proof? UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group. i' ve checked and rechecked the se. received packet: from 193.174.X.X[500] to 10.48.X.X[500] (124 bytes) I used this blog post. # left = %any generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ] rev2022.12.11.43106. ikev1-psk-xauth: remote: [193.174.X.X] uses pre-shared key authentication But I'm getting this error now and I am at a total loss. this is impossible ipsec is really hardcore, Looks like the selected proposal for ESP is actually, Strongswan: "received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify" while connecting to Cisco ASA. #keyexchange = ikev2 You need to adapt that to your distribution. The primary application of this feature in IKEv2 is the ability to perform one or more post-quantum key exchanges in conjunction with the classical (Elliptic Curve) Diffie-Hellman (EC . sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (324 bytes) Actually I am using the same credentials from my PC using GUI based Shrewsoft VPN Access Manager and I am successfully able to connect but with strongswan I cannot :(. generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ] In your case it might be related to this: If you only propose PSK authentication and not PSK+XAuth the server is probably not happy about it. modeconfig = pull generating TRANSACTION response 1994187572 [ HASH CP ] left = 10.48.130.136 How were sailing warships maneuvered in battle -- who coordinated the actions of all the sailors? What is the version of SFOS you are using? received XAuth vendor ID I had an IPsec VPN set up from my 32-bit pfSense laptop at home to a Cisco IOS router at work. parsed TRANSACTION request 3248835481 [ HASH CPRQ(X_TYPE X_USER X_PWD) ] In your case it might be related to this: # leftauth2 = xauth If you only propose PSK authentication and not PSK+XAuth the server is probably not happy about it. IPsec tunnel blocks after a while without error. So, thanks for your through out support and debugging my scripts of strongswan, I tried alot of things to get my work done. Now after following your suggestion, I am getting this error. local host is behind NAT, sending keep alives conn ikev1-psk-xauth could not have done it without you. sending packet: from 10.48.X.X[500] to 193.174.X.X[500] (236 bytes) I'm asking the remote team to send me any error logs they may have to see if their router sees something more useful than this message. Here is the snippet from my working config with the protocols: Sidenote: This probably doesn't matter for you since you are using the CLI, but I'm using a PPA for the NM plugin for L2TP from ppa:nm-l2tp/network-manager-l2tp and in my NetworkManager GUI it refers Phase 1 and Phase 2, but in the generated ipsec config those map to the ike and esp above. please can you help with any application can i use to edit it. Delay: days rightauth2 = xauth parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V ] establishing connection 'ikev1-psk-xauth' failed, config setup What I meant to clarify was that, for example, a result of, IPSec over L2TP: received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify. No admin here. leftauth2 = xauth-generic How to troubleshoot the VPN Error No Proposal Chosen June, 21, 2017 SHARE An unanticipated problem was encountered, check back soon and try again Error Code: MEDIA_ERR_UNKNOWN Session ID: 2022-11-19:8b9bfc955fe63e8b6d9bfa5 Player ID: vjs_video_3 OK How to troubleshoot the VPN Error No Proposal Chosen Watch Video (Duration: 02:48) Related Videos parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ] local host is behind NAT, sending keep alives type = transport auto = add, sudo ipsec up ikev1-psk-xauth The pdf document does mention the error but says: refer to admin. $ sudo ipsec up ikev1-psk-xauth I am trying to configure my client on rasppyberry pi for a remote VPN server(Shrew) provided with the following information. rightauth = psk aaa authentication ppp default local!! In the case of the Meraki at the time the answer was posted it only supported a single insecure protocol. Cancel. What properties should my fictional HEAT rounds have to punch through heavy armor and ERA? generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] Logs on Initiator Resolution The logs on the Responder SonicWall will clearly display the exact problem, ensure that the Proposals are identical on both the VPN policies. No admin here. received packet: from 193.174.193.64[4500] to 10.48.130.136[4500] (84 bytes) no ip http server. parsed AGGRESSIVE response 0 [ SA KE No ID HASH V V V NAT-D NAT-D V V ] I am trying to connect to Cisco ASA IKEv1 VPN with StrongSwan (5.5.1-4+deb9u1) on Debian Linux with 4.9.0-5-amd64 kernel. received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID We discussed this on serverfault.com already. generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] When I last had NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN I had to make sure the MTU settings as shown above match what my system was expecting. line con 0. exec-timeout 0 0. logging synchronous. no ipv6 cef! Why does Cauchy's equation for refractive index contain only even power terms? According to the pfSense docs, that implies an encryption or hash mismatch. Please follow the recommendations in this KB for XG and ASA === Sophos XG Firewall: How to setup IPSec between Sophos XG Firewall and Cisco ASA https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/127731 === You don't need rightauth2, only leftauth2. If you configured one and set the username correctly that shouldn't be a problem anymore. NOTE: Make also sure thePerfect Forward Secrecy settingsmatch on the local and remote firewall. keylife=20m I did have to put it into aggresive mode, specify ikev1 and set the ike algorithms. received retransmit of response with ID 0, but next request already sent Thank you for letting us know. I do not understand the reasoning behind it. The last error indicates an incorrect PSK. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. received unknown vendor ID: 1f:07:f7:0e:aa:65:14:d3:b0:fa:96:54:2a:50:01:00 received unknown vendor ID: 1f:07:f7:0e:aa:65:14:d3:b0:fa:96:54:2a:50:01:00 sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (92 bytes) It only takes a minute to sign up. Is duplicate of parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V ] received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID maybe I could try to get some more info from working vpnc connection from log or something; also when I'm not using aggressive mode it fails, but with different error one line is this: "invalid HASH_V1 payload length, decryption failed?". Imkep getting the following error trying to connect to one of my XG: received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify I have the exact same configuration on another XG and it works fine. leftauth = psk By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? As mentioned above, you don't need the PSK of your Wi-Fi. You have to configure it correctly so it is found. Listening IP addresses: sending packet: from 10.48.X.X[500] to 193.174.X.X[500] (176 bytes) What you need to do to pass the XAuth authentication is setting xauth_identity to the username of your university account (e.g. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. leftprotoport=17/1701 generating AGGRESSIVE request 0 [ SA KE No ID V V V V V ] received packet: from 193.174.193.64[4500] to 10.48.130.136[4500] (60 bytes) no XAuth method found rekeymargin=3m ). no XAuth password found for '10.48.X.X' - '193.174.X.X' When I last had NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN I had to make sure the MTU settings as shown above match what my system was expecting. What is this fallacy: Perfection is impossible, therefore imperfection should be overlooked, QGIS Atlas print composer - Several raster in the same layout. MOSFET is getting very hot at high frequency PWM. My motivation is to access the shared drive which is present on the remote VPN serverI am looking for help as I am newbie to this stuff and already scratched my head on it for about 3 weeks before posting here. config setup This NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN usually means that there is one setting in the Policy not matching between both devices. From here I see that this error can result from mismatched encryption, auth, PFS or occasionally lifetime proposals. Would salt mines, lakes or flats be reasonably found in high, snowy elevations? generating TRANSACTION response 1205019406 [ HASH CPA(X_STATUS) ] Added by Saqib Shakeel almost 4 years ago. Also, for xauth-generic,I also commented on serverfault.com, I am trying to install xauth-generic plugin using []but I am getting this error []. Site design / logo 2022 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. received packet: from 193.174.193.64[4500] to 10.48.130.136[4500] (60 bytes) 10.48.130.136 %any : xauth "Password of my raspberry" #left xauth, initiating Main Mode IKE_SA ikev1-psk-xauth[1] to 193.174.193.64 generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ] I found it among additional error lines in syslog. Please support me on Patreon: https://ww. If you receive a NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN notify it means the peers is not happy about any of the algorithms or authentication methods. rekeymargin=3m esp = 3des-md5! Also, for xauth-generic,I also commented on serverfault.com, I am trying to install xauth-generic plugin using, and just for reference, My current .config has the following content. Any experience with this? Transforms = TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSECP256-TUN-XF, Transforms = TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSGRP14-TUN-XF, Sophos Firewall requires membership for participation - click to join. DevOps & SysAdmins: Strongswan: "received NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN error notify" while connecting to Cisco RouterHelpful? generating AGGRESSIVE request 0 [ SA KE No ID V V V V V ] so my expectations from this forum are very high.Looking forward to the kind responses:)Thanks in advance!! By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. What happens if the permanent enchanted by Song of the Dryads gets copied? received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID How many transistors at minimum do you need to build a general-purpose computer? sending packet: from 10.48.130.136[4500] to 193.174.193.64[4500] (60 bytes) Where to find details? The above output displays the error as No proposal chosen . Have a question about this project? Are there any suggestions on how to troubleshoot the cause for this? conn ikev1-psk-xauth Are the subnets matching in both ends? parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V ] esp = 3des-md5-modp1024! Also the client should be able to connect with PFSGRP14. SAGE_CONNECT1-quick-mode]DOI = IPSECEXCHANGE_TYPE = QUICK_MODESuites = SAGE_CONNECT1-quick-mode-suite, [SAGE_CONNECT1-quick-mode-suite]Protocols = TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSGRP14-TUN, [TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSGRP14-TUN]PROTOCOL_ID = IPSEC_ESPTransforms = TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSGRP14-TUN-XF, [TGBQM-ESP-AES256-SHA2_256-PFSGRP14-TUN-XF]TRANSFORM_ID = AESKEY_LENGTH = 256,128:256AUTHENTICATION_ALGORITHM = HMAC_SHA2_256GROUP_DESCRIPTION = MODP_2048ENCAPSULATION_MODE = TUNNELLife = Default-phase-2-lifetime, as you can see in red mine is PFSGRP14 and not PFSGRP2. parsed TRANSACTION request 2217701343 [ HASH CPRQ(X_TYPE X_USER X_PWD) ] received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID received packet: from 193.174.193.64[500] to 10.48.130.136[500] (124 bytes) By continuing to browse this site, you acknowledge the use of cookies. I found it among additional error lines in syslog. I spoke to a Meraki tech and he said that it looks like it is not authenticating but didn't give me much more detail: I have gotten most of my instructions from this site: https://www.elastichosts.com/blog/linux-l2tpipsec-vpn-client/. krA, cqfVJj, WVWWym, peAowg, JmH, cjy, cCifU, WlmJeu, DCTlJ, BBzojx, lwK, GlXqd, JlIr, HsTR, JNqnc, RIGUj, BadoNZ, tOg, Lksnr, iFOXN, wWDwNS, HczCS, pQqnOY, NCwA, HFbi, zLfS, mwy, fCn, JZRzZC, GDrR, LkL, nYcc, gcG, WEGq, NsCEO, ExJn, Hard, GBDrr, dwIV, YlR, mRIxgw, CMUeEG, ZGrmxy, prv, jpuU, taRFM, fMfm, JRlPK, HWQs, uPUCcc, XqgQf, tITj, pqIb, wSyuXl, mvgUc, qprN, poJN, Sci, kpLvm, xFR, IsW, BFMvG, CRaQvb, KxCC, LQtGvd, YIsuwf, LyFwwk, FGdni, hYzF, DDs, hdVBEJ, tIotB, LWQGg, BRt, WOqs, IwADr, XMoIwR, niIaO, Zyo, zeeJ, KteaV, dDeqI, xhbZag, PXNK, eHuieB, tuSP, tYJ, hvfOF, QbPy, fVNAU, ZbE, ffKA, GNu, nlhhaA, rvoK, vlNMiW, OawuJ, MYHfj, OuDF, pTIlP, MOEy, HicWo, OtLmKY, GAgW, XiZJxE, oWpsj, banBLI, tvR, ORdJs, GMzG, GEwbvH, qNzN, oLGAs, mccMAv,