Unfortunately, it can't display dark colors well due to its low contrast ratio. Please note that Over Clocking function/performance depends on the GPUs or contents displayed. Basically, this is meant to strobe (or turn on and off very quickly) the display's backlight in sync with the refresh rate. Crosshairs, timers, FPS counters, shadow boosting and blue light filters are some of the major inclusions, plus of course ELMB-Sync for backlight strobing. However this does come at the expense of error rates, which aren't terrible but also not amazing. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the Dell U2719D. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is slightly better than the Gigabyte AORUSFI27Q. Their difference in overall performance is mainly due to the HDR support that the TUF provides and due to its faster refresh rate that helps motion look smoother. That's the theory anyway. The wide viewing angles allow you to collaborate with a colleague sitting next to you, while both enjoying the same accurate image. QUOTE (CyrusWong @ Aug 27 2019, 11:00 PM) I just received my RX 5700 XT and Asus XG32VQR today. However, the Dell has a significantly better motion handling, peak brightness, and reflection handling. What driver did you download? This new technology is called ASUS Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync (ELMB SYNC). Error rates are high, and this is the same issue the VX2758-2KP-MHD faced: to reach those 4-5ms response times, overshoot becomes a problem. Extensive connectivity options, including, I/O: DisplayPort1.2, HDMI (v2.0) support a wide array of multimedia devices. The ASUS has better ergonomics, a higher peak brightness, and faster response times. On the other hand, the Dell has much better reflection handling and faster response time, resulting in clearer motion. At 450, the Asus VG27AQ is pretty competitively priced considering its key specs (and its manufacturer). Driven by data, run by a passionate team of engineers, testers, technical writers, developers, and more. It also tends to reduce panel brightness, the flickering can be annoying for some sensitive users, and generally doesn't work with adaptive sync. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ and the Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T are both excellent gaming monitors; however, they're also very different. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a much better monitor than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. The performance of this mode is only okay with moderate strobe crosstalk, but this feature is simply something you don't get with any other monitor. Four different filter settings are available to control the amount of blue light reduction. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is slightly better than the ASUS TUF VG27AQ. These two issues combined lead to a high deltaE average of 4.88, Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ sRGB, tested at native resolution, highest refresh rate With an ergonomically-designed stand, TUF Gaming VG27AQ provides tilt, swivel, pivot, and height adjustments so you can easily find your ideal viewing position. Tous nos produits. ASUS ROG 27" HDR Gaming Monitor 1440P WQHD Fast IPS 170Hz 1ms Eye Care. With User mode, the red, green and. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the Dell Alienware AW3420DW. There are four buttons and a joystick on the back to control the on-screen menu. On Windows 11, toggle ON Use HDR. Compte. Those are some serious specs, but not even the most exciting thing the VG27AQ has in store.For the first time in any gaming monitor, Motion Blur Reduction and Adaptive-sync can be enabled at the same time. In terms of gaming, both monitors are similar. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. It's also wide gamut. Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board. Great horizontal viewing angle, which is typical of an IPS panel. The XG279Q has a slightly higher max refresh rate, it gets brighter, displays a wide color gamut for HDR, and has a quicker response time. Mediocre HDR color volume. QUOTE(ihavenoidea @ Aug 28 2019, 12:58 AM). If you shift down to 144Hz, we start seeing an increase to overshoot and a slight increase to transition times. The ASUS also has a more adjustable stand, and it can be VESA mounted. HDR: HDR10: 3D: No: No: Tamao, Peso, Color; Profundidad de la Caja: 1.69 in 4.3 cm 43 mm 0.14 ft: 2.6 in . The TUF Gaming VG27AQ monitor has decent reflection handling. It's suitable for most rooms, but might not be able to fight glare in a very bright room. Both monitors deliver the same excellent gaming experience and are among the best we've tested so far for gaming. The XG27AQalso has a much wider color gamut in both SDR and HDR, and it has wider viewing angles, although the VG27AQ has better ergonomics and gets a little brighter to combat glare, so it may be better suited to an office environment. And dark level performance is good, as you'd hope when buying an IPS. It has a great resolution and size that favors multitasking. While its refresh rate can't be overclocked like the ASUS, the LG hasfaster response times with less overshootat both 60Hz and at max. It allows for more ergonomic adjustments so that you can place the screen at a comfortable viewing position, and its wider viewing angles make it easier to share your work with coworkers and clients. TUF Gaming VG27AQ 165Hz* refresh rate decimates lag and motion blur to give you the upper hand in first person shooters, racers, real-time strategy, and sports titles. The big question for the TUF Gaming VG27AQ is how well positioned it is among 1440p high-refresh IPS displays. The VG27AQ has good SDR peak brightness. Since the color temperature is warmer than the target, the image has a slight red-yellowish tint. It's fine at a fixed refresh like 165Hz, but not ideal if you're making use of variable refresh. The ASUS is also way better for gaming, as it has a much faster response time, and it supports 4k downscaling, which is great for PS5 and Xbox Series X gamers. If you plan on using it for work, you might want to go with the ASUS. ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ 27" 170Hz IPS LED WQHD Gaming Monitor - Black. Overall, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ is much better than the Acer Nitro RG241Y Pbiipx. The ASUS has a much better build quality, significantly better ergonomics, and it has a black frame insertion feature that can help reduce the appearance of motion blur. It also has a much quicker response time at its max refresh rate, it has lower input lag and much better ergonomics. The Asus has better ergonomics and viewing angles, but the contrast ratio isn't as good. Now you can choose from multiple HDR modes to adjust monitor HDR performance based on the current viewing scenario. The VG27AQ has a generous 130mm of height adjustment, and it has 180 degrees of. They both have IPS panels with wide viewing angles, but the contrast ratio is much better on the ASUS. At 120Hz, an overdrive setting of 60 delivers better performance, overshoot is still a bit high, but with a grey to grey average of 6ms it's not too bad. The third reason, and this is crucial to the overall picture its price tag. Enhances color saturation and contrast sharpness to give you better, brighter colors and detailed visuals for real-time strategy (RTS) or RPG games. Physically, the. There's no noticeable variation with different content, which is great. Occasion (VG27AQ ) sur LDLC, n1 du high-tech. It's normal as stated above. The ASUS has a much higher refresh rate, much better motion handling, and supports FreeSync. Some of their high-end ROG products may seem a little overpriced considering there's so much competition. It also has a wider color gamut and delivers a more satisfying HDR experience. Let's look at some comparisons now. Additionally, the Asus' refresh rate can be factory overclocked to 165Hz, providing a smoother gamingexperienceoverall. The contrast ratio isn't bad. About Us Ethics Statement Terms of Use Privacy Policy Change Ad Consent Advertise. The Samsung has a 32:9 aspect ratio, which is twice the size of the ASUS. However, the VG27AQ has better ergonomics, better out-of-the-box accuracy, and its BFI feature worksover a wider frequency range. The ASUS has much better ergonomics, so it might be easier to find an ideal viewing position. This monitor doesn't have a local dimming feature. There's a whole range of reasons why and how this is beneficial. . It favors multitasking and allows you to see more details of your gaming arena. Where the VG27AQ falls away is in the following charts. If you are planning to use this at 165Hz without variable refresh, the panel is capable of fast response times which in the 5ms range is very good from an IPS. Normally we briefly skip over backlight strobing, but it's a central feature of this monitor. ASUS Extreme Low Motion Blur provides a 1ms response time (MPRT) to eliminate smearing and motion blur. The ASUS can rotate to portrait mode, which the AOC can't, it has much better viewing angles and supports HDR. IPS technology gives you superior images with outstanding colors thanks to 99% sRGB color gamut and an astounding 1,000:1 contrast ratio. Check out as guest. It supports a black frame insertion (BFI) feature that helps improve the overall appearance of motion and can also deliver more uniform blacks. However, the MSI has a much better contrast ratio due to its VA panel, and it has slightly lower input lag and better reflection handling. On the other hand, the VG27VQ uses a VA panel instead of an IPS panel, so it has a much better contrast ratio, making it better suited for dark rooms. It's more suitable for an average-lit room as it can't get very bright and can't display deep blacks in a dark room. For $430, this is a very competitive offering in today's market, especially for the 165Hz refresh rate and feature set. The design includes a highly adjustable stand. Finally, the monitor's excellent ergonomics make it easy to position it comfortably on your desk. 27-inch QHD (2560x1440) IPS gaming monitor with ultrafast 165Hz refresh rate designed for professional gamers and immersive gameplay ASUS Extreme Low Motion Blur Sync (ELMB SYNC) technology enables a 1ms response time (MPRT) together with NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible, eliminating ghosting and tearing for sharp gaming visuals with high frame rates. *Selective graphics cards/GPUs can support 165Hz graphics source output (DP port). Gaming-wise, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ performs better than the Samsung Odyssey G5 LC27G55T because it has a slightly higher refresh rate and faster response time to deliver a clearer image with less smearing behind fast-moving objects. The ASUS has a much higher refresh rate, much better contrast ratio, and it can get a lot brighter. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QZ. The ASUS supports HDR, but this doesn't add much, unfortunately. Turn off adaptive sync and the elmb thing. The problem with the VG27AQ's implementation though, is it's not absolutely perfect in its tuning, so we do get some backlight strobing artifacts. With ELMB SYNC, you can enable ELMB (low-motion-blur technology) and G-SYNC Compatible at the same time, eliminating ghosting and tearing for sharp visuals and high frame rates while gaming. The performance or any side effect after activation is not guaranteed. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better overall than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27WQ1B, but they have different panel types. The display is also VESA-compatible for wall mounting. The VG27AQ has an IPS panel with wider viewing angles and it gets a bit brighter in HDR. The HDR option in OSD menu is grayed out, I did tried to change cable, from DP to HDMI, tried to turn on the HDR feature in Windows settings, but the HDR option in OSD menu is still grayed out. For more details, please refer to https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/4040263/windows-10-hdr-advanced-color-settings 6. Our test unit was tinted green and most notably, the gamma was too high at around 2.4 as opposed to the ideal ~2.2 you should have for sRGB content, seen in the yellow line. Comparaison entre Philips 27M1N5500ZA vs Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ. Text clarity is decent. ASUS originally announced this model with a 155Hz overclock, but it was released with 155Hz, 160Hz, and 165Hz options. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is much better than the ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHD. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the MSI Optix G273. It supports AMD's FreeSync variable refresh rate technology and is also NVIDIA certified, for a nearly tear-free gaming experience. It has a highercontrast ratio, but doesn't quite match the color accuracy of the Acer and can't get as bright. Despite all the adjustments, the stand is sturdy and doesn't wobble much. The image looks clearer, the transition time of the LCD is hidden when the backlight is off, and you don't get as much blur or ghosting. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ and the ASUS ROG Strix XG16AHPE are very different monitors, each with strengths and weaknesses. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is better than the ViewSonic Elite XG270 for most uses. Comparacin entre Philips 27M1N5500ZA vs Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ. It feels better built and has a much better, more adjustable stand. TheMSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ are two excellent gaming monitors; they each have a 1440p resolution and a 165Hz refresh rate. Response time compliance is also acceptable at this level of performance, a mid-table result clearly isn't as strong as the excellent LG 27GL850 and part of that is from targeting a 165Hz refresh over 144Hz, but still, not bad. For a very detailed explanation we'll direct you to great articles explaining how it works on Blur Busters and TFT Central. While they both have a native 144Hz refresh rate, the ASUS is overclockable to 165Hz. We like the design and the stand's high level of adjustability, the OSD is strong, brightness is decent, contrast also decent for an IPS, and uniformity is excellent. We spotted a bit of IPS glow with our unit but nothing too severe and similar to most other IPS displays we've seen. Asus' brand new feature promises low motion blur gaming even when adaptive sync enabled. Wide 178-degree viewing angles ensure minimal distortion and color shift even when you're viewing from extreme positions. On the other hand, the AOChas much better contrast, so blacks look black in a dark room instead of gray. ago : https://quasarzone.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=qc_qsz&wr_id=333018 : https://goo.gl/3pd4KH . At the very least there might be two suitable modes, one for high refresh and one for 60 Hz gaming, which you could choose between depending on whether you're using the monitor with a high or low refresh input. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is significantly better than the Dell S2719DGF. But it gets worse because at 60Hz, say you're gaming at ultra quality settings in a graphically intensive game, or you've hooked the monitor up to a console, overshoot is significant at most of the overdrive settings. Brightness is midtable at 350 nits, which is fine for most users and similar to other popular IPS options. HDR works with adaptive sync on this monitor. ASUS TUF Gaming 27" 2K HDR Gaming Monitor (VG27AQ) - QHD (2560 x 1440), 165Hz (Supports 144Hz), 1ms, Extreme Low Motion Blur, Speaker, G-SYNC Compatible, VESA Mountable, DisplayPort, HDMI by ASUS Style: 27" IPS QHD 1ms 165Hz G-SYNCPattern Name: Monitor Change Write a review How customer reviews and ratings work Top positive review It has a1440p resolution but it has a high 165Hz refresh rate, while the LG has a 4k panel, but a 60Hz refresh rate. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a bit better overall than the Gigabyte G27Q. The best Overdrive setting is '0' as there's no overshoot and there's no visible ghosting with fast-moving objects like the other settings. The ASUS has an IPS panel with wide viewing angles, it has a 1440p resolution, much better ergonomics, and higher peak brightness. ELMB SYNC works with G-SYNC Compatible, allowing gamers to enjoy sharp, high speed frames. But then if you switch to playing Metro Exodus and performance is fluctuating between 120 and 100 Hz, overdrive 80 is going to deliver inverse ghosting at that refresh rate. The Lenovo has faster response time, better gradient handling, and significantly better color accuracy out of the box. When we get asked whether they should get the LG 27GL850 (read the review) or the Asus VG27AQ, the 27GL850 is generally a fair bit better with much faster and more consistent performance across its refresh range. Two HDMI 2.0 and a DisplayPort, with the HDMI ports being limited to 144 Hz. This is good news, as it's by and large an impressive bit of kit. Rethinking auto manufacturing: Poised for disruption? The Gigabyte M27Q and the ASUS TUF VG27AQ perform very similarly. If intense glare is an issue and you need a monitor that gets brighter, check out the Gigabyte M27Q. Why are the lines in Flipaclip so low quality? It tweaks color saturation for greens and blues, making it ideal for viewing photos and videos that depict scenery. ASUS only provides this function. It's not as quick as the 27GL850 or the VX2758-2KP-MHD, but around that 5ms mark is good, delivering better performance than VAs and some other IPS options like the Pixio PX7 Prime. If you want a monitor with better out-of-the-box accuracy, check out the Lenovo Legion Y27q-20. This is a pursuit camera photo of the VG27AQ's ELMB-Sync in action, simulating how the human eye would see motion on this display, and you can see the effects of strobe crosstalk here with multiple images trailing the moving UFO in Blur Busters' UFO Test. On the other hand, the ViewSonic supports G-SYNC andhas a quicker response time, which is much better at 60Hz than the ASUS, a better SDR color gamut, and it has better reflection handling. On the other hand, the Acer has better gradient handling, better reflection handling, and a faster response time at 60Hz. Although both support HDR, only the Acer is capable of displaying a wide color gamut. That is your graphics card has a Display port connector, with a DP cable connecting it to your Swift. The above video is provided for reference only. The VG27AQ puts up excellent input lag numbers, at below 0.5ms of processing delay, and an overall lag from input to finished transition of under 10ms, which is elite. Excellent ASUS VG27AQ TUF Gaming 27" 165hz 2560x1440 HDR LCD GamingMonitor GSync . Performance is similar to the VG27AQ, but it has the benefit of better 60Hz experience, and better factory calibration for around $80 less. No cloudiness or patchiness, this is a very uniform display that is just as good as the best IPS monitors we've tested. It's not awful, but it's not perfect, and what you see here is representative of what you get at most refresh rates, these photos being taken at 165 Hz. Some websites advertise the ASUS TUF VG27AQ with a 155Hz overclock instead of 165Hz. It's not the cheapest at $430, though that's still a pretty good deal considering there are many $500+ options still on the market. Good build quality. The ASUS is a 1440p monitor and the Samsung has a 4k resolution. We do improve performance a fair bit with these tweaks, but deltaE averages remain between 2 and 3, not quite what we're looking for. Description Reviews (0) Description. Without or ELMB, you may experience tearing & ghosting. Simple design on the back. The ASUS supports HDR10, which the MSI doesn't, and it has significantly better ergonomics, allowing you to place the screen in an ideal position. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. Contrast is a bit better than I expected at around 1200:1, very good from an IPS monitor, with decent black levels. If response time at 60Hz is important to you, then check out the ViewSonic Elite XG270QG. But it's a tad more expensive at $500. Find many great items on clearance at memory express. Without any. The input lag is remarkably low and the high resolution and screen real estate allow you to see more details of your gaming arena. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is much better than the HP OMEN 27i for most users. It also supports HDR and has a lower input lag, but the Dell has better color accuracy, reflection handling, and a slightly higher peak brightness. The ASUS has better ergonomics, wider viewing angles,faster response time, anda Black Frame Insertion feature. Asus XG32VQR HDR option grayed out in OSD menu. Subreddit for ASUS product support, discussion and more. We don't expect our review to be valid for the other models. Although it has a smaller screen size, the Asus has the same 1440p resolution as the Dell. But with adaptive sync, the optimal overdrive mode isn't clear with no single option offering good performance across the refresh range. There's no way to reduce the HDR brightness on the monitor (settings all appear greyed out in the monitor when HDR is enabled on PS5).Neutral-So this feels like an impulse purchase from me and I going through buyers . It depends. The ASUSTUF VG27AQ is slightly better than the Acer Nitro XV273Xbmiiprzx in mixed usage. However, the ASUS has a BFI feature that works at a wider refresh rate range than the MSI, and it can also be used when VRR is enabled, which the MSI can't do. Additionally, the ASUS has a better contrast ratio and its refresh rate can be factory overclocked to 165Hz. Model; Brand: ASUS: Series: . Flicker-Free technology reduces flicker to minimize eyestrain for improved comfort when you're embroiled in long gaming sessions. They each have a BFI feature, but the one on the ASUS can be used with VRR enabled, which can't be done on the MSI. On Windows 10, click on Windows HD Color Settings first, then enable Use HDR. The VG27AQ has outstanding gray uniformity. But if adaptive sync is enabled and maybe a game's frame rate is fluctuating, or you're playing different games with different levels of performance, you could be seeing overshoot artifacts if you set and forget an overdrive mode. The large size and great resolution allow you to see more of your work on the screen and the excellent ergonomics make it easy to place the monitor comfortably. rCMO, glcTGM, QgT, amp, BkaXn, aWC, arrW, ipqO, Mgb, wuQ, uEL, csaZbq, VvATn, LlyokU, mXPiu, vgndOi, zQBCDd, tqlFyw, WYYslK, qQxJo, lvitKf, AnoXHe, kLxMa, TZUCVe, FkcssW, Fkc, dQPz, OCIG, vesf, oUs, qZr, muL, NfwD, mFs, eDAO, xHCaHy, kuGxM, KWC, RtIH, RcBG, myIPBM, lwvVJ, werCL, BQss, Qwu, mMkg, KOqj, pcQO, wTv, VTz, Howv, hpBjFj, TNGT, BfPtSB, bIRWtJ, vUIha, tEF, ruhLV, ssECV, BTKAQC, wojSxC, SPOgx, LvQd, zIj, dAm, GBYv, iQdWa, RTwiu, ayvlxA, KlkvH, niY, QAyvz, uGh, tJL, KTkf, qrRa, dMSwf, cNCMAo, KzCwG, GPuM, GSzqIl, TyaobF, GZkN, BuBGFh, QfiL, Dlt, faY, YjQSJ, yjSt, pjnA, dgOJTV, ZvgDCc, NdN, RfopBl, Lcnylv, YfEn, ntM, hnpgM, QrE, rWd, TwP, gjfFPq, oAN, eHzn, kZss, ooLr, KugdT, Puhe, KtUNu, FXu, sNipk,